Should You Work With A Broker Or Direct Lender For Alternative Financing?

Should You Work With A Broker Or Direct Lender For Alternative Financing?

0 Comment

It’s common knowledge that you are likely to achieve a lower cost for a product or service, by cutting out as many “players” within the ecosystem as possible and eliminating all of the middlemen who markup said products and services for profit. However, in certain cases, the middleman might actually be your source for cost savings and higher levels of efficiency than if you were to go “direct.”

This is certainly the case many times in the alternative business financing space, which is centered on products that include the merchant cash advance and alternative small business loan. As a merchant, you might actually receive better levels of service, better product placement, and better pricing by working with the “middleman” compared to initially working directly with the funder/lender.

Financing Marketplace—Save Time

Don't waste hours of work applying for financing—Get matched based on your needs and credit scores. Approval in 10 minutes. Start browsing now.

For this article, I wanted to discuss the benefits of working with a broker versus going direct and working with a funder/lender, when a business owner is seeking alternative business financing.

Alternative Financing Products

For this article, in comparing the choice to work with a broker or a direct funder/lender, I’m going to make the examination strictly on the basis of the Merchant Cash Advance product and the Alternative Small Business Loan products. In case you aren’t aware of these products, here’s a quick recap below:

The Merchant Cash Advance (MCA): The MCA is the purchase of future credit card receivables using a cost factor with no interest rates, APRs, origination fees, nor fixed terms.  A purchaser (funder) would take a look at a merchant’s (seller’s) previous processing statements and note that the business has been doing $85,000 a month in processing over the last year. Based on that volume, the funder offers to buy $102,000 of future processing receivables in exchange for advancing the merchant $85,000 tomorrow, but keeping 20% of the merchant’s daily processing volume until the full purchased amount is collected. This would translate into an offer of:

  • Approval: $85,000
  • Cost Factor: 1.20
  • Total Payback: $102,000
  • Holdback: 20%
  • Note: As long as the merchant continues to process like normal, the full purchase should be completed in 6 months.

The Alternative Small Business Loan: This product is offered by the same companies that would offer an MCA product and is a real business loan with interest rates, fixed terms, an origination fee, etc. Terms usually range from six to 60 months, with costs from 7.99% to 45%. Approvals are based on about 10% of annual gross revenues, so a company doing $1 million a year in sales with a decent credit profile, might receive options for a 12-month, 18-month, 24-month, and 36-month loan offer, with the 12-month option looking like the following:

  • Approval: $85,000
  • Origination Fee: 2.5%
  • Disbursement Amount: $82,875
  • Interest Cost: 22%
  • Total Payback: $103,700
  • Payment Schedule: Daily Fixed Payment of $411 every business day
  • Number Of Payments: 252
  • Term: 12 Months

The Different Players

In the alternative financing space (similar to other financing spaces) you have both brokers and direct funder/lenders that you could submit an application package to.

The Broker would manage all of the activity involved with the sales process and submit the package to one or more direct funders/lenders to fund your application. The Broker would chase down additional signatures, paperwork, and more. Brokers are compensated through marking up a buy rate that’s provided by the direct funder/lender on the individual deal. So if you are approved for $100,000 on a six-month payback with a 1.14 buy rate, the broker might mark this up by three-to-10 points (to 1.17 – 1.24) to make their revenue.

The Direct Funder/Lender  is usually a licensed commercial funder who has their own underwriting team, system, and criteria that they utilize to directly fund working capital requests. Some will also house internal inside sales teams to manage inbound lead sources that originate outside of the broker channel.

Pros/Cons of Working With A Broker

In terms of the positives of working with a competent broker, they can save you a lot of wasted time and energy submitting your applicant package to direct funders/lenders that aren’t the best suited for your current risk profile.

As outlined in my MCA underwriting article here on Nav, you might be an A Paper merchant, but actually be submitting your package to a funder/lender that only specializes in C Paper merchants, which means you will not receive the best terms that you actually qualify for. A competent broker would know the market, learn about your current situation, and submit your package to the best funder/lender who can not only offer approval, but the best terms for your current profile.

However, speaking of “competency,” the major drawback in working with brokers is that many of them are not competent. As of this writing, there really isn’t any regulatory body that oversees brokers in the alternative financing space, so as a result, many have limited industry experience, do not have an efficient network of funders/lenders, and many use unscrupulous acts by marking up buy rates too high, charging side service fees, and stealing the identity of merchants.

Pros and Cons of Working With A Direct Funder/Lender

In terms of the positives of working with a direct funder/lender, the main positive is that you can easily verify if the entity is real, credible, and regulated. You can look up their license, usually find that they are a part of professional associations, review their BBB profile, and review online reviews of the firm.

The main negative is that you are handcuffed to the underwriting and approval criteria of that one firm.

Again, as outlined in my MCA underwriting article here on Nav, you might be an A Paper merchant but have unknowingly submitted your package to a C Paper funder/lender. You might qualify for higher approval amounts, longer terms, and lower costs, but that C Paper funder/lender might only push out smaller approvals, smaller terms, and higher costs.

As a merchant, the honest truth is that it’s almost impossible for you to know your Paper Grade and know which funder/lender in the alternative financing marketplace is best suited for your current risk profile. Only a competent broker can assist with said action.

Services General—marketplace

Pro Tip:
Running a business is tough, but there are plenty of services that make it easier. From website builders, to accounting software, to payroll— get the best deals on business services here.

Rate This Article

This article currently has 2 ratings with an average of 3 stars.

About the Author — John Tucker has over ten years of professional experience in Commercial Finance and Business Development. Tucker is also an M.B.A. graduate and holder of three bachelor's degrees in Accounting, Business Management, and Journalism. To connect with John Tucker, feel free to send him a connection invite via LinkedIn at: www.linkedin.com/in/johntucker99

Have at it! We'd love to hear from you and encourage a lively discussion among our users. Please help us keep our site clean and protect yourself. Refrain from posting overtly promotional content, and avoid disclosing personal information such as bank account or phone numbers.

Reviews Disclosure: The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the credit card, financing and service companies that appear on this site. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the credit card, financing and service companies and it is not their responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *